Questions for Review
ثبت نشده
چکیده
1. First, Keynes conjectured that the marginal propensity to consume—the amount consumed out of an additional dollar of income—is between zero and one. This means that if an individual’s income increases by a dollar, both consumption and saving increase. Second, Keynes conjectured that the ratio of consumption to income—called the average propensity to consume—falls as income rises. This implies that the rich save a higher proportion of their income than do the poor. Third, Keynes conjectured that income is the primary determinant of consumption. In particular, he believed that the interest rate does not have an important effect on consumption. A consumption function that satisfies these three conjectures is
منابع مشابه
مرور سیستماتیک “Systematic Review” چیست وچگونه نگاشته میشود؟
Abstract Background: Successful clinical decisions are the outcome of a complex process. In making them, we draw on information from scientific evidences, our personal experience and external rules and constraints. Considering that the explosive increase in the amount and quality of the scientific evidence that has come from both the laboratory bench and the bedside, we may lack the time, mo...
متن کاملA systematic review of questionnaires used on oral health knowledge, attitude, and practice in 12-year-olds
BACKGROUND AND AIM: National oral health knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) data among 12-year-old children need nation-wide programs to help promote oral health. In most countries, oral epidemiologic data are collected by self-administered structured questionnaires. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the existing literature about questionnaires used for analyzin...
متن کاملGuessing in Multiple Choice Questions: Challenges and Strategies
Introduction: Guessing is one of the most challenging issues in multiple choice questions. Several strategies, such as negative scoring, have been suggested for preventing students from choosing the right answer just by chance. However, there is no general agreement on using such strategies. The aim of this study was to review the scoring methods which are used for reducing guessing, and evalua...
متن کاملارزیابی منابع اطلاعاتی پزشکی مبتنی بر شواهد براساس میزان پاسخدهی به پرسشهای بالینی
Introduction: This study was to identify the best accessible electronic information resources for finding answers to clinical questions in Iranian National Medical Digital Library. Methods: 20 clinical questions were randomly selected from four areas: prevention and treatment, diagnosis, etiology and prognosis from American National Library of Medicine (NLM). The keywords were searched in info...
متن کاملThe Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews: Addressing Questions of Prevalence
Background Recently there has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Key features of a systematic review include the creation of an a priori protocol, clear inclusion criteria, a structured and systematic search process, critical appraisal of studies, and a formal process of data extraction followed by methods to synthesize, or combin...
متن کاملQuality analysis of multiple choice questions(MCQs) examinations of noncontinuous undergraduate medical records
Introduction: There are Different methods for evaluating student stuff. One of the most commons is multiple choice questions (MCQs). If properly designed, it is a good way to measure student knowledge. Due to expansion using MCQs, This study was designed in order to review the quality of multiple choice question exam types of medical records students of Hormozgan University of Medical Sci...
متن کامل